https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300671 Article 226 proceedings are independent original proceedings and are not a continuation of the suit or other proceeding from which they arise. Section 5(2)(a) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 applies only to pending suits, proceedings for correction of records, and similar matters concerning rights or interests in land before the relevant court or authority. A writ petition does not itself determine the underlying land rights in the original suit or proceeding, and that original proceeding cannot be treated as pending in the High Court for abatement purposes. The consolidation scheme was also described as not curtailing constitutional writ jurisdiction, so writ petitions and special appeals arising from them remain unaffected by the provision. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300671 Article 226 proceedings are independent original proceedings and are not a continuation of the suit or other proceeding from which they arise. Section 5(2)(a) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 applies only to pending suits, proceedings for correction of records, and similar matters concerning rights or interests in land before the relevant court or authority. A writ petition does not itself determine the underlying land rights in the original suit or proceeding, and that original proceeding cannot be treated as pending in the High Court for abatement purposes. The consolidation scheme was also described as not curtailing constitutional writ jurisdiction, so writ petitions and special appeals arising from them remain unaffected by the provision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300671