<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28059</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest in the computation of income from house properties transferred to his wife and minor children under Sections 64(1)(iv) and (v), 24(1)(vi), and 27(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the court held that Section 52(2) could not be applied to tax the capital gains in question, citing precedents including CIT v. Rikadas Dhuraji [1976] 103 ITR 111 (Mad) and K. P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597 (SC).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28059</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest in the computation of income from house properties transferred to his wife and minor children under Sections 64(1)(iv) and (v), 24(1)(vi), and 27(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the court held that Section 52(2) could not be applied to tax the capital gains in question, citing precedents including CIT v. Rikadas Dhuraji [1976] 103 ITR 111 (Mad) and K. P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597 (SC).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>