https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418531 The HC directed respondent no.4 to decide on the petitioner's representations regarding rectification of incorrect place of supply in GSTR-1 within eight weeks. The decision must consider a relevant Madras HC judgment and the Circular dated 29th December, 2017. If allowed, the petitioner should be permitted to rectify GSTR-1 within one week. The decision must be communicated to the petitioner within one week of the order. If adverse, the petitioner may pursue further legal remedies. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418531 The HC directed respondent no.4 to decide on the petitioner's representations regarding rectification of incorrect place of supply in GSTR-1 within eight weeks. The decision must consider a relevant Madras HC judgment and the Circular dated 29th December, 2017. If allowed, the petitioner should be permitted to rectify GSTR-1 within one week. The decision must be communicated to the petitioner within one week of the order. If adverse, the petitioner may pursue further legal remedies. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws GST Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418531