<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The deletion of the addition under Section 56(2)(viib) was justified based on the substantiated valuation method chosen by the assessee, and the restriction of disallowance under Section 14A was in line with judicial precedents limiting disallowance to the amount of exempt income earned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 755 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The deletion of the addition under Section 56(2)(viib) was justified based on the substantiated valuation method chosen by the assessee, and the restriction of disallowance under Section 14A was in line with judicial precedents limiting disallowance to the amount of exempt income earned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>