<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 745 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the request for conversion of free shipping bills to advance authorization shipping bills. It held that statutory provisions prevail over circulars, emphasizing that procedural amendments should be permitted when supported by documentary evidence existing at the time of export. The Tribunal concluded that the rejection was unjustified and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 745 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the request for conversion of free shipping bills to advance authorization shipping bills. It held that statutory provisions prevail over circulars, emphasizing that procedural amendments should be permitted when supported by documentary evidence existing at the time of export. The Tribunal concluded that the rejection was unjustified and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>