<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 740 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418489</link>
    <description>Operational debt and default were found established on the basis of invoices and a ledger showing a running account with unpaid dues, so the section 9 insolvency application was fit for admission. No genuine pre-existing dispute was shown because the corporate debtor&#039;s objections were limited to accounting and reconciliation issues raised after the demand notice, which were not treated as a prior dispute under the Code. The claim was also held to be within limitation because the application was filed within three years of the last payment on the running account under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Corporate insolvency resolution process was directed to commence, an interim resolution professional was appointed, and moratorium consequences followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 740 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418489</link>
      <description>Operational debt and default were found established on the basis of invoices and a ledger showing a running account with unpaid dues, so the section 9 insolvency application was fit for admission. No genuine pre-existing dispute was shown because the corporate debtor&#039;s objections were limited to accounting and reconciliation issues raised after the demand notice, which were not treated as a prior dispute under the Code. The claim was also held to be within limitation because the application was filed within three years of the last payment on the running account under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Corporate insolvency resolution process was directed to commence, an interim resolution professional was appointed, and moratorium consequences followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>