<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 735 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418484</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and providing consequential relief. The Court held that the petitioner was not obligated to respond to the statement of demand seeking recovery of service tax on services provided under the clubs/associations category, as the issue had already been settled in the petitioner&#039;s favor based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and the Court&#039;s previous ruling in the petitioner&#039;s case. The connected miscellaneous petitions were ordered to be closed without costs, emphasizing that the matter was resolved in the petitioner&#039;s favor due to established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 735 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418484</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and providing consequential relief. The Court held that the petitioner was not obligated to respond to the statement of demand seeking recovery of service tax on services provided under the clubs/associations category, as the issue had already been settled in the petitioner&#039;s favor based on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision and the Court&#039;s previous ruling in the petitioner&#039;s case. The connected miscellaneous petitions were ordered to be closed without costs, emphasizing that the matter was resolved in the petitioner&#039;s favor due to established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>