<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 731 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for central excise duty, interest, and penalty on waste and scrap products. It held that the Commissioner (Appeals) should have followed the earlier Tribunal decision, which determined that no excise duty applied to the scrap materials. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to superior tribunal decisions for judicial discipline and maintaining order in the administration of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 731 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming the demand for central excise duty, interest, and penalty on waste and scrap products. It held that the Commissioner (Appeals) should have followed the earlier Tribunal decision, which determined that no excise duty applied to the scrap materials. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to superior tribunal decisions for judicial discipline and maintaining order in the administration of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>