https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418471 In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged trafficking through courier consignments, no recovery was made from the accused, and the prosecution relied mainly on Section 67 statements, mobile records, and witness narration. The accused's Section 67 statement was not treated as substantive evidence, and the witness evidence did not directly link him to delivery of the parcels, while the person said to be able to identify the delivery was not examined. Despite the Section 37 embargo for commercial quantity cases, the Court found the material insufficient to establish prima facie guilt or a likelihood of reoffending on bail, and regular bail was granted. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418471 In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged trafficking through courier consignments, no recovery was made from the accused, and the prosecution relied mainly on Section 67 statements, mobile records, and witness narration. The accused's Section 67 statement was not treated as substantive evidence, and the witness evidence did not directly link him to delivery of the parcels, while the person said to be able to identify the delivery was not examined. Despite the Section 37 embargo for commercial quantity cases, the Court found the material insufficient to establish prima facie guilt or a likelihood of reoffending on bail, and regular bail was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418471