<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1327 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300653</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing substantial evidence to support additions based on valuation reports and highlighting the burden of proof on the revenue to establish discrepancies in declared considerations. The case underscored the need for concrete evidence and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1327 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300653</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of providing substantial evidence to support additions based on valuation reports and highlighting the burden of proof on the revenue to establish discrepancies in declared considerations. The case underscored the need for concrete evidence and adherence to legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>