<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 670 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking removal and replacement of the Resolution Professional, citing the Applicant&#039;s lack of entitlement under the relevant sections of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal emphasized that disciplinary proceedings against the Resolution Professional fall under the jurisdiction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and not the Adjudicating Authority. It clarified the IBBI&#039;s authority to handle complaints and impose penalties for misconduct, ultimately denying the Applicant&#039;s request for a change of Resolution Professional without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 670 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application seeking removal and replacement of the Resolution Professional, citing the Applicant&#039;s lack of entitlement under the relevant sections of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal emphasized that disciplinary proceedings against the Resolution Professional fall under the jurisdiction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and not the Adjudicating Authority. It clarified the IBBI&#039;s authority to handle complaints and impose penalties for misconduct, ultimately denying the Applicant&#039;s request for a change of Resolution Professional without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>