<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 664 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418413</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the impugned order due to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s failure to allow cross-examination, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, with instructions to grant cross-examination, allow a detailed reply, provide a personal hearing, and issue a reasoned order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding principles of natural justice and referenced a previous order to ensure fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:42:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 664 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418413</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the impugned order due to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s failure to allow cross-examination, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, with instructions to grant cross-examination, allow a detailed reply, provide a personal hearing, and issue a reasoned order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding principles of natural justice and referenced a previous order to ensure fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>