<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 72 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28038</link>
    <description>The Court held that the deduction of salary paid to the karta for managing the family business relating to partnership firms was admissible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal was granted discretion to assess the actual deductible amount based on the case&#039;s circumstances. The Court referred to relevant case law establishing that such payments are permissible if bona fide, not excessive, and justified by commercial expediency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 72 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28038</link>
      <description>The Court held that the deduction of salary paid to the karta for managing the family business relating to partnership firms was admissible under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal was granted discretion to assess the actual deductible amount based on the case&#039;s circumstances. The Court referred to relevant case law establishing that such payments are permissible if bona fide, not excessive, and justified by commercial expediency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>