https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418405 HC ruled in favor of the petitioner challenging GST Department's search and seizure operations conducted without following Section 74 of CGST Act. The court found that the Rs. 11.5 crores deposit was obtained through coercion, not voluntarily. The petitioner's representative had retracted their confession, which was allegedly extracted forcibly. The court issued an interim order preventing authorities from taking coercive steps against the petitioner and directed that no GST amount be collected without following proper statutory procedure under Section 74 until the next hearing. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418405 HC ruled in favor of the petitioner challenging GST Department's search and seizure operations conducted without following Section 74 of CGST Act. The court found that the Rs. 11.5 crores deposit was obtained through coercion, not voluntarily. The petitioner's representative had retracted their confession, which was allegedly extracted forcibly. The court issued an interim order preventing authorities from taking coercive steps against the petitioner and directed that no GST amount be collected without following proper statutory procedure under Section 74 until the next hearing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418405