<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 649 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418398</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The court found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding share capital and premium satisfactory. Additionally, the verification of the credentials of the share-holders was deemed adequate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 649 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418398</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The court found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding share capital and premium satisfactory. Additionally, the verification of the credentials of the share-holders was deemed adequate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>