<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 626 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418375</link>
    <description>In insolvency proceedings, a penalty for non-maintenance and non-production of the corporate debtor&#039;s records must be imposed under the governing Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code framework, with a meaningful opportunity of hearing to the affected ex-directors. Although the record showed repeated non-cooperation and failure to respond to calls for reply and production of records, the appellate tribunal found that the impugned penalty had been imposed by invoking the Companies Act in proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code after hearing the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 626 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418375</link>
      <description>In insolvency proceedings, a penalty for non-maintenance and non-production of the corporate debtor&#039;s records must be imposed under the governing Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code framework, with a meaningful opportunity of hearing to the affected ex-directors. Although the record showed repeated non-cooperation and failure to respond to calls for reply and production of records, the appellate tribunal found that the impugned penalty had been imposed by invoking the Companies Act in proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The penalty order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code after hearing the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>