https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418369 The existence of a revisional remedy under the special enactment did not bar the High Court's inherent jurisdiction where quashing was sought to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, so the petition was treated as maintainable. The supplementary complaint and cognizance order also disclosed a prima facie basis for interim interference because the later complaint appeared to rely on material already recorded before the first complaint, with allegations substantially repeating earlier CBI material. The cognizance order was therefore stayed, while the merits were left for further consideration after pleadings. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:11:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418369 The existence of a revisional remedy under the special enactment did not bar the High Court's inherent jurisdiction where quashing was sought to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice, so the petition was treated as maintainable. The supplementary complaint and cognizance order also disclosed a prima facie basis for interim interference because the later complaint appeared to rely on material already recorded before the first complaint, with allegations substantially repeating earlier CBI material. The cognizance order was therefore stayed, while the merits were left for further consideration after pleadings. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 02 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418369