https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418368 The court allowed the proceedings to continue in a case where a petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice demanding service tax on core banking facilities. The legality of powers granted to the DGGSTI was questioned, with proceedings allowed to continue but no adjudication order to be passed. The petitioner also contested the validity of Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994, alleging it violated constitutional rights. The court did not provide a specific ruling on this section but addressed all issues raised, scheduling the next hearing and extending the stay order. en-us Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:11:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418368 The court allowed the proceedings to continue in a case where a petitioner challenged a Show Cause Notice demanding service tax on core banking facilities. The legality of powers granted to the DGGSTI was questioned, with proceedings allowed to continue but no adjudication order to be passed. The petitioner also contested the validity of Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994, alleging it violated constitutional rights. The court did not provide a specific ruling on this section but addressed all issues raised, scheduling the next hearing and extending the stay order. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418368