https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300621 Interim protection was sought against notices disqualifying directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and against the resulting consequences. The petition challenged the notices on grounds of violation of natural justice, retrospective operation of the disqualification provisions, and non-compliance with the notice requirements linked to striking off the company's name. Pending adjudication of the writ petition, and following the approach adopted in similar matters, the Delhi High Court granted interim stay of the impugned notices and directed revival of the petitioners' DIN numbers and digital signatures until the next date of hearing. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:10:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300621 Interim protection was sought against notices disqualifying directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and against the resulting consequences. The petition challenged the notices on grounds of violation of natural justice, retrospective operation of the disqualification provisions, and non-compliance with the notice requirements linked to striking off the company's name. Pending adjudication of the writ petition, and following the approach adopted in similar matters, the Delhi High Court granted interim stay of the impugned notices and directed revival of the petitioners' DIN numbers and digital signatures until the next date of hearing. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300621