https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300619 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay due to vague and unsupported grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant's claims of negligence by consultants lacked specific evidence, resulting in the refusal to condone the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate delay claims caused by negligence, ultimately leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:10:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300619 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking condonation of delay due to vague and unsupported grounds, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant's claims of negligence by consultants lacked specific evidence, resulting in the refusal to condone the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate delay claims caused by negligence, ultimately leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300619