https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418358 The HC directed respondent to decide petitioner's representation within eight weeks regarding correction of customer's GST number in GSTR-1 Return and Invoice. The decision must consider relevant Circulars from December 2017 and Madras HC judgments. If allowed, respondent must permit rectification within one week. If denied, petitioner may file further proceedings. The Writ Petition was allowed, making the rule absolute without costs. The case involved inadvertent errors in SAP requiring correction of GSTN numbers from Andhra returns, with representations pending since December 2021. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418358 The HC directed respondent to decide petitioner's representation within eight weeks regarding correction of customer's GST number in GSTR-1 Return and Invoice. The decision must consider relevant Circulars from December 2017 and Madras HC judgments. If allowed, respondent must permit rectification within one week. If denied, petitioner may file further proceedings. The Writ Petition was allowed, making the rule absolute without costs. The case involved inadvertent errors in SAP requiring correction of GSTN numbers from Andhra returns, with representations pending since December 2021. Case-Laws GST Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418358