<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1290 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300612</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with directions for fresh adjudication by the Tax Tribunal on specified grounds, particularly regarding the inclusion of functionally dissimilar comparables, working capital adjustment, interest on outstanding receivables, and facilitation costs. The tribunal emphasized judicial consistency and remanded several issues for reconsideration in light of previous decisions and legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:29:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1290 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300612</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with directions for fresh adjudication by the Tax Tribunal on specified grounds, particularly regarding the inclusion of functionally dissimilar comparables, working capital adjustment, interest on outstanding receivables, and facilitation costs. The tribunal emphasized judicial consistency and remanded several issues for reconsideration in light of previous decisions and legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>