<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the second Principal Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s action of invoking revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 was null and void as it did not satisfy the condition precedent. The reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was deemed to be valid as it was based on a thorough enquiry and verification of facts. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the impugned action of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:29:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 604 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the second Principal Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s action of invoking revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 was null and void as it did not satisfy the condition precedent. The reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was deemed to be valid as it was based on a thorough enquiry and verification of facts. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the impugned action of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>