https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300609 An order taking cognizance and issuing process is treated as a final or intermediate order, not a mere interlocutory order, so the revisional remedy under Section 397 is ordinarily available. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 is a saving power to be used sparingly and cannot be invoked merely to bypass the statutory revisional route. On the facts, allegations of cheating in a hotel transaction and misbranding under the Insecticides Act did not show a jurisdictional bar, lack of authority, or clear abuse of process. The cognizance orders were therefore not fit for quashing under Section 482, and the parties were relegated to revision. en-us Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:42:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300609 An order taking cognizance and issuing process is treated as a final or intermediate order, not a mere interlocutory order, so the revisional remedy under Section 397 is ordinarily available. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 is a saving power to be used sparingly and cannot be invoked merely to bypass the statutory revisional route. On the facts, allegations of cheating in a hotel transaction and misbranding under the Insecticides Act did not show a jurisdictional bar, lack of authority, or clear abuse of process. The cognizance orders were therefore not fit for quashing under Section 482, and the parties were relegated to revision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300609