<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 589 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418338</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the computation of royalty income based on agreement clauses. The Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of all passenger vehicle models, including loss-making ones, led to a variance with the assessee&#039;s declared royalty income. The failure to consider expenses related to loss-making models impacted royalty computation. The application of transfer pricing principles was crucial, questioning the binding nature of the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order on the Assessing Officer. The relevance of previous/subsequent assessment years in royalty adjustments and the authority of the Transfer Pricing Officer were key points of contention, emphasizing the need for clarity on jurisdiction and roles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:56:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 589 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418338</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the computation of royalty income based on agreement clauses. The Assessing Officer&#039;s inclusion of all passenger vehicle models, including loss-making ones, led to a variance with the assessee&#039;s declared royalty income. The failure to consider expenses related to loss-making models impacted royalty computation. The application of transfer pricing principles was crucial, questioning the binding nature of the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s order on the Assessing Officer. The relevance of previous/subsequent assessment years in royalty adjustments and the authority of the Transfer Pricing Officer were key points of contention, emphasizing the need for clarity on jurisdiction and roles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>