<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the delay in obtaining star classification was due to the competent authority, allowing the deduction under section 35AD if so. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, emphasizing that the assessee should not be penalized for delays caused by authorities. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 588 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the delay in obtaining star classification was due to the competent authority, allowing the deduction under section 35AD if so. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, emphasizing that the assessee should not be penalized for delays caused by authorities. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>