<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add Rs. 15 crore as income from other sources. The Tribunal found that the sub-contractors were genuine entities, contrary to the AO&#039;s belief, and that the addition was based on presumption without concrete evidence. Referring to precedent, the Tribunal held that only the profit from such receipts could be taxed, not the entire amount, and since the assessee had declared a net profit on the contract receipt, no further addition was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:56:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 587 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add Rs. 15 crore as income from other sources. The Tribunal found that the sub-contractors were genuine entities, contrary to the AO&#039;s belief, and that the addition was based on presumption without concrete evidence. Referring to precedent, the Tribunal held that only the profit from such receipts could be taxed, not the entire amount, and since the assessee had declared a net profit on the contract receipt, no further addition was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>