<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 585 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418334</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessees, deleting the disallowances sustained by the CIT(A) regarding delayed deposits of employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI, prior to the amendment by the Finance Act, 2021. The ITAT held that the amendment did not have retrospective effect and should not apply to the assessment years in question. The ITAT also found the prima facie adjustments by the CPC to be erroneous, citing favorable judicial precedents. The order in favor of the assessees was pronounced on 18/01/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 585 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418334</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessees, deleting the disallowances sustained by the CIT(A) regarding delayed deposits of employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI, prior to the amendment by the Finance Act, 2021. The ITAT held that the amendment did not have retrospective effect and should not apply to the assessment years in question. The ITAT also found the prima facie adjustments by the CPC to be erroneous, citing favorable judicial precedents. The order in favor of the assessees was pronounced on 18/01/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>