<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1321 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300601</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that comparability in transfer pricing must rest on functional similarity and the presence of extraordinary events. MindTree Ltd. was rightly excluded because it underwent strategic acquisition, amalgamation and subsidiary dissolution, and also had heavy R&amp;D and significant intangibles, making it functionally dissimilar. E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd. and Persistent Systems Ltd. were also excluded because prior co-ordinate bench decisions found them not comparable to routine software development, with Persistent Systems treated as engaged in outsourced product development. The arm&#039;s length adjustment on interest for delayed receivables was deleted because it was made without comparable uncontrolled data for the relevant segment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1321 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300601</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that comparability in transfer pricing must rest on functional similarity and the presence of extraordinary events. MindTree Ltd. was rightly excluded because it underwent strategic acquisition, amalgamation and subsidiary dissolution, and also had heavy R&amp;D and significant intangibles, making it functionally dissimilar. E-Infochips Bangalore Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd. and Persistent Systems Ltd. were also excluded because prior co-ordinate bench decisions found them not comparable to routine software development, with Persistent Systems treated as engaged in outsourced product development. The arm&#039;s length adjustment on interest for delayed receivables was deleted because it was made without comparable uncontrolled data for the relevant segment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>