<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28018</link>
    <description>The court held that the litigation expenses incurred by the assessee were not allowable deductions as revenue expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court also disallowed the premium amount paid for insurance covering risks in traveling for one of the directors, stating it was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the business purposes of the company. The judgment was unfavorable to the assessee, who was directed to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 5 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28018</link>
      <description>The court held that the litigation expenses incurred by the assessee were not allowable deductions as revenue expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court also disallowed the premium amount paid for insurance covering risks in traveling for one of the directors, stating it was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the business purposes of the company. The judgment was unfavorable to the assessee, who was directed to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>