<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by modifying the disallowance on bogus purchases to 2% and directing a lump sum addition for commission expenses. The benefit of telescoping was granted for the addition on account of bogus purchases to cover the commission expenses. The addition under section 69C for unexplained expenditure was upheld with the condition of telescoping from the addition made on account of bogus purchases in the same assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by modifying the disallowance on bogus purchases to 2% and directing a lump sum addition for commission expenses. The benefit of telescoping was granted for the addition on account of bogus purchases to cover the commission expenses. The addition under section 69C for unexplained expenditure was upheld with the condition of telescoping from the addition made on account of bogus purchases in the same assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>