<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 575 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ruled in favor of the appellant, an individual and trader, regarding the disallowance of interest expense amounting to Rs. 5,82,80,708 as a prior period expenditure. The Tribunal held that the interest liability crystallized during the assessment year under consideration when the loan account was settled, justifying the appellant&#039;s non-claim of interest expenses in earlier years. As a result, the disallowance of the interest expense was deemed unjustified, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 575 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and ruled in favor of the appellant, an individual and trader, regarding the disallowance of interest expense amounting to Rs. 5,82,80,708 as a prior period expenditure. The Tribunal held that the interest liability crystallized during the assessment year under consideration when the loan account was settled, justifying the appellant&#039;s non-claim of interest expenses in earlier years. As a result, the disallowance of the interest expense was deemed unjustified, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>