<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 572 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the impugned additions made under Section 36(1)(va) deserved to be deleted as the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 were not applicable retrospectively. The decision was pronounced in favor of the assessee, providing relief from the disputed addition related to employees&#039; share of contribution to ESI.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 572 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the impugned additions made under Section 36(1)(va) deserved to be deleted as the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 were not applicable retrospectively. The decision was pronounced in favor of the assessee, providing relief from the disputed addition related to employees&#039; share of contribution to ESI.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>