https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418320 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to deny excess agriculture income claimed by the assessee due to lack of evidence. However, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee by reducing the addition on account of deposits in the bank. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418320 The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to deny excess agriculture income claimed by the assessee due to lack of evidence. However, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee by reducing the addition on account of deposits in the bank. The appeal was partly allowed based on these findings. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418320