<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 561 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418310</link>
    <description>Eligibility under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 depends on whether service tax liability had crystallised as arrears. Where an Order-in-Original quantified and confirmed the demand and no appeal was filed, the confirmed amount constituted &quot;amount in arrears&quot; and therefore &quot;tax dues&quot;. A separate arrears declaration remained permissible despite the earlier show cause notice. Treating such a declaration under the litigation category was inconsistent with the Scheme&#039;s beneficial dispute-resolution object. The payable amount was required to be computed on the basis of the confirmed demand under the arrears category.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2022 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 561 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418310</link>
      <description>Eligibility under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 depends on whether service tax liability had crystallised as arrears. Where an Order-in-Original quantified and confirmed the demand and no appeal was filed, the confirmed amount constituted &quot;amount in arrears&quot; and therefore &quot;tax dues&quot;. A separate arrears declaration remained permissible despite the earlier show cause notice. Treating such a declaration under the litigation category was inconsistent with the Scheme&#039;s beneficial dispute-resolution object. The payable amount was required to be computed on the basis of the confirmed demand under the arrears category.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>