<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28013</link>
    <description>The High Court held that post-partial partition of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), there was no association of persons and assessments should be done individually for the divided members. The court emphasized that income diversion occurred due to the partition, resulting in individual ownership of income shares. The assessments as an association of persons were deemed erroneous, and the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing all Departmental appeals and awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28013</link>
      <description>The High Court held that post-partial partition of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), there was no association of persons and assessments should be done individually for the divided members. The court emphasized that income diversion occurred due to the partition, resulting in individual ownership of income shares. The assessments as an association of persons were deemed erroneous, and the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing all Departmental appeals and awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>