<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 548 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418297</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders dated 30.08.2019 and 16.09.2019 passed by the NCLT, Mumbai Bench, in a case involving the admission of a petition under Section 7 of the IBC. The matter was remitted back to the NCLT for a reevaluation, with instructions to hear all parties, including the Appellant and Respondent No. 1, regarding the Interim Resolution Professional&#039;s fee and expenses, and to pass appropriate orders within six weeks. The Appellant&#039;s contentions regarding denial of opportunity and improper application of relevant provisions were upheld, emphasizing the importance of fair proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2022 20:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 548 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418297</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the orders dated 30.08.2019 and 16.09.2019 passed by the NCLT, Mumbai Bench, in a case involving the admission of a petition under Section 7 of the IBC. The matter was remitted back to the NCLT for a reevaluation, with instructions to hear all parties, including the Appellant and Respondent No. 1, regarding the Interim Resolution Professional&#039;s fee and expenses, and to pass appropriate orders within six weeks. The Appellant&#039;s contentions regarding denial of opportunity and improper application of relevant provisions were upheld, emphasizing the importance of fair proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>