<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418291</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of input service credit for repair and maintenance expenses related to a Captive Wind Mill located outside the factory gate. The Tribunal relied on precedents and agreements between the appellant and the Western Grid, determining that the wind mill was a captive unit eligible for the credit. The misinterpretation of agreements by lower authorities played a significant role in the decision, leading to the grant of consequential benefits to the appellant. The issue of limitation was left open as the appeal was allowed on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2022 20:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418291</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of input service credit for repair and maintenance expenses related to a Captive Wind Mill located outside the factory gate. The Tribunal relied on precedents and agreements between the appellant and the Western Grid, determining that the wind mill was a captive unit eligible for the credit. The misinterpretation of agreements by lower authorities played a significant role in the decision, leading to the grant of consequential benefits to the appellant. The issue of limitation was left open as the appeal was allowed on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>