https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418288 Criminal proceedings arising from a business transaction and cheque dishonour were not liable to be quashed where the complaint and charge sheet disclosed supply of goods, issuance and repeated dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds, and conduct suggesting non-payment after receipt of the goods. Parallel proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not by itself bar IPC prosecution because cheating requires dishonest intention at inception, which was prima facie alleged on the facts. The material on record disclosed a triable case of deception and wrongful loss, so threshold interference was unwarranted and the quash request was rejected. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Feb 2022 20:42:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418288 Criminal proceedings arising from a business transaction and cheque dishonour were not liable to be quashed where the complaint and charge sheet disclosed supply of goods, issuance and repeated dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds, and conduct suggesting non-payment after receipt of the goods. Parallel proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act did not by itself bar IPC prosecution because cheating requires dishonest intention at inception, which was prima facie alleged on the facts. The material on record disclosed a triable case of deception and wrongful loss, so threshold interference was unwarranted and the quash request was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418288