https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300577 The Court dismissed the revision case, upholding the lower courts' judgments that found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The decision was based on the prosecution's stronger evidence, highlighting the lack of substantial rebuttal evidence from the accused. The Court emphasized the significance of prima facie evidence in cheque dishonor cases and affirmed the burden of proof distinction from civil claims. The accused's failure to adequately counter the allegations led to the confirmation of guilt and the rejection of the revision case. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Feb 2022 20:38:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300577 The Court dismissed the revision case, upholding the lower courts' judgments that found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The decision was based on the prosecution's stronger evidence, highlighting the lack of substantial rebuttal evidence from the accused. The Court emphasized the significance of prima facie evidence in cheque dishonor cases and affirmed the burden of proof distinction from civil claims. The accused's failure to adequately counter the allegations led to the confirmation of guilt and the rejection of the revision case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300577