<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 526 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the addition of Rs. 15,89,438/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, confirming the deletion directed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the cash seized belonged to the assessee company and was recorded in its books, thus not meeting the criteria for undisclosed income. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the addition was removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2022 09:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 526 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the addition of Rs. 15,89,438/- made by the Assessing Officer under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, confirming the deletion directed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the cash seized belonged to the assessee company and was recorded in its books, thus not meeting the criteria for undisclosed income. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the addition was removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>