<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28007</link>
    <description>The court held that a sole surviving coparcener can dispose of coparcenary property as if it were his separate property. Gifts made by the coparcener from Hindu undivided family (HUF) property to family members were deemed valid. Capital gains arising from such gifts were not to be taxed in the hands of the coparcener. The court referenced legal principles and precedent to support its decision. The ruling favored the coparcener, upholding the validity of the gifts and dismissing the need for a High Court reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28007</link>
      <description>The court held that a sole surviving coparcener can dispose of coparcenary property as if it were his separate property. Gifts made by the coparcener from Hindu undivided family (HUF) property to family members were deemed valid. Capital gains arising from such gifts were not to be taxed in the hands of the coparcener. The court referenced legal principles and precedent to support its decision. The ruling favored the coparcener, upholding the validity of the gifts and dismissing the need for a High Court reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>