<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1904 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300566</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The tribunal emphasized the need to examine the commercial expediency of advances and the proper application of Section 40A(3) regarding cash payments. The issue of jurisdiction was not adjudicated due to the partial allowance of the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2022 09:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1904 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300566</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The tribunal emphasized the need to examine the commercial expediency of advances and the proper application of Section 40A(3) regarding cash payments. The issue of jurisdiction was not adjudicated due to the partial allowance of the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>