<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1792 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300558</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-III Baroda dated 22-02-2010, involving the addition of Rs. 14,13,600 and interest disallowance of Rs. 13,62,808, was decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14,13,600, as the assessee was deemed a developer and not a contractor, making AS-7 inapplicable. Additionally, the interest disallowance of Rs. 13,62,808 was also deleted, as there were no borrowings with payable interest. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=670017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1792 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300558</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-III Baroda dated 22-02-2010, involving the addition of Rs. 14,13,600 and interest disallowance of Rs. 13,62,808, was decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14,13,600, as the assessee was deemed a developer and not a contractor, making AS-7 inapplicable. Additionally, the interest disallowance of Rs. 13,62,808 was also deleted, as there were no borrowings with payable interest. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>