https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418261 Regular bail was granted in a complaint under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of five years, the petitioner had already undergone custody for about 2 years and 8 months, and the trial was likely to take time. The Court treated the custody period as substantial, noted that the allegations were still unproved, and accepted the assurance that the petitioner would not obstruct the trial or influence witnesses. Bail was allowed without expressing any opinion on the merits, subject to conditions securing the petitioner's presence. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418261 Regular bail was granted in a complaint under the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the alleged offence carried a maximum sentence of five years, the petitioner had already undergone custody for about 2 years and 8 months, and the trial was likely to take time. The Court treated the custody period as substantial, noted that the allegations were still unproved, and accepted the assurance that the petitioner would not obstruct the trial or influence witnesses. Bail was allowed without expressing any opinion on the merits, subject to conditions securing the petitioner's presence. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418261