https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418258 The HC disposed of a writ petition filed by a proprietorship firm seeking CGST refund of Rs. 88,13,408/- for April-September 2020. The petitioner argued that respondents failed to process the refund within statutory timeframes under Section 54(6) and 54(7) of CGST Act and Rule 91(2) of CGST Rules. The respondents accepted notice and undertook to decide the refund application within three weeks in accordance with law. The court accepted this undertaking, bound the respondents to it, and scheduled a compliance date. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418258 The HC disposed of a writ petition filed by a proprietorship firm seeking CGST refund of Rs. 88,13,408/- for April-September 2020. The petitioner argued that respondents failed to process the refund within statutory timeframes under Section 54(6) and 54(7) of CGST Act and Rule 91(2) of CGST Rules. The respondents accepted notice and undertook to decide the refund application within three weeks in accordance with law. The court accepted this undertaking, bound the respondents to it, and scheduled a compliance date. Case-Laws GST Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418258