<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 498 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418247</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed a delay in filing an appeal and the scope of the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the revenue. It held that the Commissioner cannot exceed the allegations in the notice while adjudicating the matter, based on legal precedents. The stay application was also dismissed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:22:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 498 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418247</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta addressed a delay in filing an appeal and the scope of the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, ultimately dismissing the appeal by the revenue. It held that the Commissioner cannot exceed the allegations in the notice while adjudicating the matter, based on legal precedents. The stay application was also dismissed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>