<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 489 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418238</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous. It directed the Assessing Officer to tax interest income appropriately and allow proportionate expenses. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to provide the assessee an opportunity to present evidence in set-aside proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:22:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 489 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418238</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous. It directed the Assessing Officer to tax interest income appropriately and allow proportionate expenses. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with instructions for the AO to provide the assessee an opportunity to present evidence in set-aside proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>