<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 488 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418237</link>
    <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, while the appeal and cross objection of the assessee were treated as allowed. The ITAT set aside the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s order on expense disallowance and directed the AO to re-determine the disallowance following a specific precedent. The ITAT also addressed the legal issue regarding the import of disallowance under section 14A into section 115JB, directing the AO to compute the addition independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 07:22:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 488 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418237</link>
      <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, while the appeal and cross objection of the assessee were treated as allowed. The ITAT set aside the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s order on expense disallowance and directed the AO to re-determine the disallowance following a specific precedent. The ITAT also addressed the legal issue regarding the import of disallowance under section 14A into section 115JB, directing the AO to compute the addition independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>