<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 466 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418215</link>
    <description>The court held that applications for defaulted amounts less than Rs. 1 crore filed after the amendment to Section 4 of the IBC are not maintainable. It ruled that the amendment applies to applications filed after 24.03.2020, regardless of when the default occurred. The court emphasized that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to entertain such applications post-amendment and set aside the NCLT&#039;s order, declaring the application not entertainable under the amended Section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=669940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 466 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418215</link>
      <description>The court held that applications for defaulted amounts less than Rs. 1 crore filed after the amendment to Section 4 of the IBC are not maintainable. It ruled that the amendment applies to applications filed after 24.03.2020, regardless of when the default occurred. The court emphasized that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to entertain such applications post-amendment and set aside the NCLT&#039;s order, declaring the application not entertainable under the amended Section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>